Questions Proposed Growth Boundary

[This Letter to the Editor appeared in the Fitchburg Star on May 31, 2007.]

As an observer at the Plan Commission meeting on May 15th, I was very disappointed at both the process and the results. Please consider my points and join me in questioning the Proposed 50-year Growth Boundary at the open house and public hearing on June 5th.

(1) I saw little consideration for protecting the ecosystem - our shared habitat which extends beyond the 36 square mile rectangle called Fitchburg. Planners should look at the impact of everything they do including the effect on the area to our east which is much more precious and fragile than any other so-called “undeveloped” area in Fitchburg! The wetlands, streams and lake have “developed” through a very slow process that takes millions of years. The Town of Dunn, Nature Conservancy, DNR and others have invested enormous amounts of time and money to preserve these priceless and essential natural areas. But, Mother Nature has her limits, so we must become good stewards of the earth instead of developing the Northeast Neighborhood and much of the eastern side of Fitchburg as currently proposed.

(2) I overheard several inappropriate comments including: “Who owns that property?” and “You might as well grab that one.” This process should not be treated as a land grab and this phase should be independent of individual landowners. We need a cautious approach that respects the wishes of area residents, as it preserves and protects what’s really important… the world we leave for our children. A survey indicated that Fitchburg residents value farmland, open space and natural areas. We want clean air and water. How can we ensure these things for future generations?

(3) I observed a rush to expand development at a rate approaching 75 acres a year for 50 years. The Commission’s vision turns Syene Rd into another McKee Rd lined with new development. But, as one of a growing number of “localvores,” my vision for Fitchburg includes many places to buy locally grown, organic food. Our farmland will become more and more valuable in the future. Let’s preserve it.

(4) Although Commission members included "infiltration" and "soil types" in a worthy attempt to use some objective criteria, I wonder if they understand the danger of paving over hydric soils in the Northeast Neighborhood by using a narrow definition for “good” infiltration that omits these soils.

We have until 2010 to develop a new comprehensive plan. Yes, we need to start now. But, let’s hear expert testimony and consider scientific data before we change the face, and the life support systems, of Fitchburg.

Terry Carpenter
Fitchburg